Baby Center Ltd.has Been Approached by the Government Chegg

Update January 7, 2022: The numbers in the Denmark study described beneath are now confirmed past regime data from Deutschland showing that vaccinated people are 8X more than likely to develop Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is not surprising since a paper from Germany showed the same thing: the more you vaccinate, the worse it gets.

Worried about Omicron? Guess what? Later on 90 days, the vaccine they gave y'all is going to make you MORE likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the future and the easier you'll make it for the virus.

In brusk, we've been lied to about the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In brusk, you lot are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.

These vaccines may aid you win the war against a variant that may soon be rare, only the price you pay is that yous make your amnesty to everything else worse. It'southward a dumb tradeoff (especially since early treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won't believe any of the scientific discipline referenced in this article, so information technology volition continue.

Alix Mayer alerted me to this game changing tweet about a written report in Kingdom of denmark which instantly went viral every bit you can see from the number of retweets:

I want to tell y'all what this really means and how information technology is being attacked.

Summary: Refuse to comply with mandates. Now.

This newspaper means we volition need to inject people every 30 days if we want to "protect" them. Based on the harm that the vaccines exercise to our immune organization, it'south likely that the needed interval will shorten with each booster.

If people don't get boosted as required, they will be MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren't vaccinated. That'due south what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn't hateful the protection wears off (like nosotros were told). It means the Contrary of what y'all were told: information technology means the vaccines helps the virus to infect yous (by suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time nosotros are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). It means nosotros were lied to.

In short, the vaccine is like a heroin habit: in one case yous've had a gustation of it, you are hooked: you have to continue it for life if you desire protection. If you stop it, you're a sitting duck for the virus.

What's worse is our government is mandating this at present. In low-cal of this newspaper, they will change the vaccine mandates to force you lot to become vaccinated every month or you lot will be fired from your chore. Their next motility could well exist to make information technology illegal non to be vaccinated. This seems like where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where they are quickly stripping away your rights to do anything without a vaccination.

And we accept no clue what monthly (and after weekly) vaccination volition do to your torso. This has never been tested.

My advice is simple. If you have been vaccinated, yous need to end at present. Do not get the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is addicted of repeating the erstwhile adage, "When you find yourself in a hole, stop excavation ."

Sadly, most people cannot afford to lose their jobs, so they will get vaccinated and medical professionals will non speak out since doing so will crusade them to lose their license.

The faster, safer, lower cost mode to cease the pandemic

Everyone needs to terminate listening to the CDC now and start listening to people who have been saying to ditch the vaccines and aggressively promote early treatment with repurposed drugs.

The unabridged pandemic volition end every bit soon as the CDC stops ignoring the existing early on treatment protocols which take been bachelor since March 2020 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was starting time available back then). Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never needed. We could take (and nonetheless tin) terminate the hospitalization and decease with just one thing: early treatment. Just similar Japan has done. Simply the CDC refused to listen.

What the paper said in detail

First, the link in the tweet is to the outdated version of the paper. The current version can exist plant hither.

Start at the comments, both from social media and as well from medrxiv readers.

Bank check out the social media portion of the comments

Here are some comments (on erstwhile and new version of the paper):

• So assume the results y'all similar (high VE for recent vaccination) are causal, but paw wave confounders at results y'all don't like (negative VE for afar vaccination)? Science?

• This is a superb paper, especially the conscientious approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.

• Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all effectiveness at xc days, but worse, actually drop into potent negative effectiveness later that time.

  This would hateful that these vaccines *increase* one's chances of infection after the initial ninety days "honeymoon" catamenia.

  Am I getting this right?

  If so, why are governments pushing third doses as Omicron is becoming dominant?

The key material is in the full PDF:

The graphs above tell the story. Negative VE means the vaccine is helping the virus, not yous.

Then at 60 days, the protection is close to zero, so if y'all want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is required.

This isn't a vaccine at all. This is basically stimulating your immune organisation and so it is already "geared up" to fight the virus. That's not what a vaccine is supposed to do.

Furthermore, the negative VE afterward ninety days means you are hooked for life and I would approximate (based on the mechanism of action), that we will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster yous get (since information technology kills off your immune organisation every time).

So information technology could very well be monthly boosters after the 2nd dose, weekly boosters afterward the 3rd dose, and perhaps daily boosters after the 4th dose to maintain your "immunity."

You tin can't end later that considering if y'all cease, you're in worse shape than if you never started.

The stunning determination of the paper

In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.

All I can say is "wow." The people who wrote this paper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their estimation of what their study means.

They besides wrote this (which is purely speculative with no data behind it every bit noted in the italics were my addition):

The negative estimates in the final period arguably advise dissimilar behaviour and/or exposure patterns in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE. This was likely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly initially through unmarried (super-spreading) events causing many infections among young, vaccinated individuals.

This paper should be a wake upwards call: the vaccines practise non work. Cease repeating the insanity.

Early treatments like the Fareed and Tyson protocol are 10X better than any new therapy, they don't "hook y'all," and they don't cause inability or death.

If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson protocol, we'd accept near no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they can't practice that since medical lath volition accept away the licenses of whatever physicians who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening now.

Nosotros are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are corrupt and incompetent and they volition not concur themselves answerable in an open debate. This has been going on for twenty years in the vaccine space… it'south goose egg new. The book "Bear witness of harm" documents all of this. Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (beingness non-judgmental like reporters are supposed to be), simply any neutral thinking person volition side confronting the authorities.

Why the paper went viral

Then, the reason this paper went viral is considering

1. It is well done,

2. It was done by PhDs in communicable diseases and epidemiology,

3. The results show what is really happening, and

4. Nobody has been able to set on the newspaper with a credible statement, even on Twitter.

5. It confirms what my team of experts has been saying near negative VE

Hither are some of the ridiculous attempts to discredit the newspaper:

Supporting show

The paper isn't a fluke. There is lots of other prove in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative explanation for information technology).

Here'southward the data from Canada which shows that we have it backwards. We should exist mandating "no vaccines" in society to keep your chore and burn all the vaccinated people because these people are the most risky.

In Ontario in the final few days, cases per capita amidst the vaccinated accept skyrocketed to a higher place cases per capita amidst the unvaccinated. Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this betoken, because the entire case for restricting unvaccinated people is their presumed college per capita infection rate.

Here's the U.k. data showing the same thing. We need to flip effectually the mandates ASAP.

Other supporting data:

1. On COVID vaccines: why they cannot piece of work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative office in deaths afterward vaccination and the video nearly that newspaper. If the vaccines don't kill you, they volition leave you lot weaker. Over 90% of the deaths investigated after vaccination were found to accept been caused by the vaccines. In that location is no other caption.

2. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses
   An fantabulous article by Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism for why we are seeing the effect that the more than you vaccinate, the more you lot make things worse for people. The vaccine amercement both your adaptive and innate allowed systems.

3. Vaccine efficacy declines to be negative in the Uk (Expose article)

4. Booster protection fades within x weeks against Omicron: UK written report

5. Booster shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for nearly 10 weeks, study finds — which could mean more than doses for some in 2022

6. This substack article looks at the Danish study (described here) and the UK information. Annotation that the VE numbers in the two studies are different because if you divide our Omicron, you become a very different flick of VE compared to analyses that don't dissever out VE by variant.

7. Dr. Ron Dark-brown – Opinion Editorial

   December 23, 2021

   Ontario, Canada reported five,790 new COVID-19 cases on Thursday, Dec 23, 2021, setting the province'south 1-day tape for new cases since the beginning of the pandemic: Ontario: Case numbers | COVID-19. Thursday's numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to 4,392 fully vaccinated new cases—a rapidly rising trend over the past several weeks conspicuously showing that most new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.

Please help us to spread the word by sharing this commodity on social media.

wilsonsopen1961.blogspot.com

Source: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be

Share this post